FDA document admits “covid” PCR test was developed without isolated covid samples for test calibration, effectively admitting it’s testing something else

By Naomi Wolf

A document just released by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) openly admits that the infamous PCR test for the Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19) was developed not with actual samples of the Chinese Virus, but rather what appears to be genetic material from a common cold virus.

Since the Fauci Flu in any of its “variant” forms has yet to be properly isolated, the FDA instead used regular cold/flu viruses to produce PCR tests – meaning everyone who tests “positive” for Chinese Germs is actually just testing positive for the seasonal flu.

This would, of course, explain why the flu nearly disappeared in 2020, as everyone who got sick was assigned a “covid” diagnosis. Many were saying this from the beginning and being called “conspiracy theorists,” but now the FDA is fessing up to the truth that this whole thing was a scam all along.

In the FDA document, it is clearly stated that ordinary seasonal flu genetic material was used as the testing marker in the PCR test kits because the authorities knew that many people would test “positive” for it, thus allowing them to use these results to create the “covid” narrative.

It is somewhat of a lengthy read, but have a look for yourself and see the deception in plain sight. There is no legitimate test out there that accurately identifies the presence of the Fauci Flu, and this is the smoking gun. From the document:

Since no quantified virus isolates of the 2019-nCoV were available for CDC use at the time the test was developed and this study conducted, assays designed for detection of the 2019-nCoV RNA were tested with characterized stocks of in vitro transcribed full length RNA (N gene; GenBank accession: MN908947.2) of known titer (RNA copies/µL) spiked into a diluent consisting of a suspension of human A549 cells and viral transport medium (VTM) to mimic clinical specimen.

Another revelation in the document is the admission by the FDA that test results are “pooled” together to produce numbers that are inaccurate. The FDA is quite literally manufacturing data as part of the plandemic narrative, and it is all revealed in the document.

Fraudulent PCR tests are being used to push vaccine genocide

What this all proves is that the plandemic narrative, as it was spread over the past year and a half, is contrived and false. What people are truly testing “positive” for remains unknown, or is just the common flu, because the tests are inherently fraudulent.

If more people would simply take a closer look at the facts, perhaps we could put a stop to the government’s vaccine genocide agenda, which aims to forcibly vaccinate everyone against their will under the cover of a public health “emergency.”

Though we are not quite at that point as of yet, the Biden regime is moving full-steam ahead with plans to deprive Americans of work, an education and even food if they refuse to take a Trump Vaccine to help “save lives.”

We are at a crossroads as a society where the time is now to decide if we are going to allow this type of medical fascism to persist, or if we are finally going to just say no to government tyranny.

Especially with regard to children, what the government is pushing using these fraudulent PCR tests as backing is nothing short of genocide. And unless we stop it, it will eventually affect us all.

“If the vaccine works, then the vaccinated should be protected from the rest of us,” one of our commenters rightfully pointed out. “If the vaccinated still contract the virus or any variant, then the vaccine doesn’t work, so why do they insist that I take it?”

“If they say that they are catching the variants from us unvaccinated, what proof do they have to back that up? How can they say for sure that they didn’t catch it from another vaccinated person? They can’t. Seeing that the vaccinated can contract it, they must also be able to spread it.”


  1. Dear Naomi,

    Can you please provide a link to and the title of the FDA document?

    The document that’s attached to the bottom of the article is the 7th revision of a *CDC* document, “CDC 2019-Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) Real-Time RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel”. The document itself is not new, it’s at least a year old, and that language about “no isolates were available” has been there.

    So if you’re referring to a different document I’d appreciate a link and the name please. Thank you.

    I miss seeing you on Twitter!!!


    1. Page 40

      Since no
      quantified virus isolates of the 2019-nCoV were available for CDC use at the time the test was developed
      and this study conducted,


      1. I understand “quantified” to mean known quantity of or countable. The term “quantified virus isolates of” puzzles me.


  2. Nej i Canada, vann Patrik King i rätten, mot etablissemanget, när han bad om dokument på isolerat covid. Han skulle bet 12.000 dollar, men vann i domstol, och ALLA restriktioner försvann i staden efter det.


    1. Nej i Kanada, Patrick King vann inte rättsfallet och de restriktioner som upphävdes hade inget att göra med fallet. Virusisolering är det enda värdet för detta fall.


  3. Nous nous réveillerons tous de cette hypnose collective.
    Souvenez-vous la farce hypnotique powell-saddam-anthrax dont nous avons tous été victimes et dont nous sommes sortis quand les mensonges ont été avérés. Tout reviendra comme avant (et pas avant) dès que les toubibs reprendront la pratique médicale selon leur conscience, en vertu du serment d’Hippocrate et du code de déontologie auxquels big-comico-économico-pharma (qui les a expropriés de leur activité) en tant que commerçant ne participe pas. L’art, la pratique, la prescription médicale concernent un métier et pas un commerce. Les procès annoncés pointent le bout du nez. Nombreux seront déshypnotisés ensuite Reiner-Drosten-pécéaire, d’autres fauci-mails, d’autres IVM-india-oms puis les craques avec le pass-sanitaire se dévoileront.
    Nous sommes tous, chacun, chacune carrément victimes d’une hypnose collective entretenue par une peur imbécile, exagérée et extravagante.
    Quand l’art médical est remplacé par des marchands alors la zombification (dépendance vaccinale ad vitam aeternam et profits colossaux) par big-comico-économico-pharma est assurée. Quand l’obéissance est travestie en responsabilité, la peur considérée comme vertu et le courage une tare que tous dénoncent. Quand la séparation est justifiée par les autorités alors l’hypnose collective et la peur s’ancrent un peu plus. La rédemption sanitaire arrive ; et bienveillants nous rééduquerons coupables et victimes. Nous nous réveillerons tous de cette hypnose collective.

    La peur est entretenue méthodiquement, injonctions hypnotiques TV et radio Gentils citoyens écoutez la voix ; la seule véridique : “la bestiole va nous anéantir”… tremblez tremblez “hors vaccins point de salut” … une méthode de secte… tabous-totems et tutti quanti … Réveillons-nous de cette peur imbécile (la peur – pas nous évidement) !
    Et ces peurs entretiennent l’hypnose collective avec des berceuses et autres éléments de langages infantilisants : violons, trompettes, 🎼🎤chantons en cœur la comptine et fable tragi-comique ou rigolo-scientifique.
    “Je reviens te chercher lalalalallaalla j’savais qu’les vaccins m’attendaient”.

    Alors une petite fable pour détendre l’atmosphère : Sur la route de Bagdad la peste rencontre le choléra ! ça va l’ami ? oui je vais à Bagdad faire 20 000 morts…ok a bientôt… ils se retrouvent après leurs escapades respectives ! ben l’ami tu m’avais dit aller à Bagdad pour 20000 décès et j’ai entendu dire qu’il y en a eu 100000 ! comment se fait t.il ? Oui j’ai bien provoqué 20000 décès et les 80000 autres sont morts de peur !



  4. That is indeed true, but reading further down it does mention that RNA under the code GenBank: MN908947.2 was induced into human cells and used as the standard. That RNA belongs to a “recombinant expressed and purified receptor-binding domain (RBD) of SARS-CoV-2”. I am not saying this biomedical procedure makes the test reliable, since I am not an expert, but it certainly doesn’t mention the use of the seasonal flu as the blog suggests (at least on page 40 of the cdc document).


  5. @Masterat: thank you! But this only shifts the problem to a new question. “…RNA under the code GenBank: MN908947.2 was induced into human cells and used as the standard. That RNA belongs to a “recombinant expressed and purified receptor-binding domain (RBD) of SARS-CoV-2”. – One needs to check the authenticity of this Virus-fragment.


    1. So the test is calibrated against human cells.. so what does that say about the people who test negative?


      1. Yes, human cells with the RNA induced in them were used as the standard for the test. In other words, these cell samples were taken as standard positive for all PCR tests.
        Assuming the technique is reliable, people who dont have that stripe of RNA in their system would test negative, as it is unique to the virus itself. And those who are infected with SARS-CoV-2 would test positive, as the RNA of the virus would be picked up on the test.
        This is all on paper of course, as the reliability of the technique is uknown to me.


    2. As I said previously, the fact that they decided to go with this technique in face of the short supply of a good sample doesnt mean it is reliable at all. There are many things that should be considered to determine the reliability for such procedure: as you mentioned the authenticity of the RNA fragment is a big concern; the fragment could be unique to SARS-CoV-2 or general for all corona/SARS viruses; the specific fragment may not be present for all variants; and I am sure much more.
      Since I am not an expert on the topic or a geneticist I dont know of any way to determine the authenticity of the RNA fragment, other than extracting it from the virus sample itself.


  6. Bonjour à vous. Je vais paraître tatillon, mais je pense qu’il serait bien, à chacun de vos paragraphe, de signaler le nr de page concerné de ce document qui en compte 80.
    Cela permettrait aux lecteurs d’identifier plus facilement les parties concernées..


  7. Why was NIH allegedly pressuring Daszak’s EcoHealth Alliance to obtain and provide a sample from China of the virus they, China, allegedly isolated and used to obtain the published genome? Did someone in or over NIH have doubts ? Why couldn’t the U.S. government request and get a sample from China if there were no issues, and not have to resort to sneaky methods ?


    1. More precisely,
      “SOURCE Wuhan seafood market pneumonia virus
      ORGANISM Wuhan seafood market pneumonia virus
      Viruses; Riboviria; Nidovirales; Cornidovirineae; Coronaviridae;
      Orthocoronavirinae; Betacoronavirus; unclassified Betacoronavirus.”

      So is pneumonia virus actually 7 viruses?


    2. So versions 1 and 2 call it a pneumonis virus but version 3 changes to “Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 isolate Wuhan-Hu-1, complete genome”. I wonder why the change?


  8. i listened to geert vanden bossch describe that we are all shedding the same variant of the virus no matter what our status is….. the difference is that vaccinated immune pressure eventually leads to different variants. We all breath in and out the same thing as everyone else…. is the general idea…. and hopefully reduces our fear of each other or of THE OTHER.
    Love will conquer all.


Leave a Reply to Timo Kino Cancel reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s