2 Comments

  1. Just in time (drosten is due in court over this soon). I have a strong feeling (looking at their past track records) that this is an effort to avoid all the class actions worldwide, just weeks before they actually go to court over it. Also, by claiming it was only a few brands that cause this, or have high false positives (even though that is caused by cycle rates, not by brand) then they can claim to have adressed the issue, while leaving the others on the market and increasing the counter-narrative that they are “safe and effective”.
    These groups seem to be ignoring the charges and court cases, however when this happens, there will then be a tribunal style court in a more neutral country. (because) In usa, canada, england and australia, courts/ judges can ignore and dismiss cases without review of evidence.

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s